Monday, November 3, 2008

deleted stuff

OPPRESSED JAZZ
-----------Hello, Okay, here's the problem. When people speak of Female Oppression, these words are merely spoken as an excuse to become totally attached with her, on an emotional scale. And that happens to be the END RESULT. You're showing total devotion toward women, whilst using "Oppression' as an excuse.

Also, Too many people see the world through literature, rather than observing real life. In our everyday lives, women tend to be socially privileged. But our 2-dimensional media says otherwise. therefore, most people trust the media more than their own personal experience. I probably shouldn't say this, but: in blunt terms: Women treat men like the Niggers of society. (example: When dating: she acts as though he's lucky to be with her.).

Also, most articles which make claims regarding 'women as victims' will ineveitable conclusion They always declare that women have special gifts and abilities. And the male is incapable of deriving the complex thoughts and emotions which are expressed by women. Also, there's always a few words regarding the fragile male ego. Which, of course, is prejudice against men. But of course, nobody ever cares.

When speaking of human sexuality, my views are unorthodox. I'm one of the few men who becomes offended when people describe how much I enjoy it. And, the whole idea that, she's God's greatest gift to men. It's amazing, How, I'm the only person on this earth who recognizes this arrogance on her part.

Finally, I consider myself to be the most progressive thinker of my generation. (I'm sorry if that sounds arrogant). Here's why I make this remark: When people speak of passages from the bible which are biased against women, this actually GIVES AN ADVANTAGE TO HER, NOT a disadvantage. Does that sound crazy? Consider this: It makes her seem like the innocent victim who can never be wrong. Plus, It forces people to always understand things from her perspective. In other words, we owe it to her. Moreso, It allows people to emotionally bond with her. Then, she's allowed to reference this information in order to make MEN look like dummies. So, it gives her the power to seek artificial vengence. Afterall, she's been given a convenient issue which can be used at her disposal.

Let's also consider the fact that Men are burdened with guilt and shame, each time a piece of ancient literature supposedly degrades women. As I've stated before: It really pays to be the victim. She's got no worries in the world. Basically, she wouldn't want things any other way. It's the perfect situation for every woman. This has more to do with Psychology than anything else. Humans tend to be debatists. And it all becomes a question of who's able to create the biggest fuss. This is why women always steer toward this narrow issue. the Eagles song said it best: "Victim of this, and a Victim of that". Essentially, this Dogma enables her to WIN every argument.

Now, with all said: consider how often the media displays bias against men. Each television station will victimize the male viewers several dozen times per day. Not to mention every sector of the media. Why then doesn't anyone complain about that. Maybe a possible answer lies with the bogus story of Lilith. She can always remind us how everybody is prejudice against her. Thus forcing everyone to totally agree with her, at all times.

And you must admit, people do feel entitled to devote their heart and soul toward Women. It's a non-stop celebration of Feminine Inner Beauty.
In realistic terms: the whole situation is 100% favorable for her. 0% for me.

sincerely, ....

---------------------------------
FORCED LESBIANISM

It's an epidemic:
Women will be Sexually Assaulted by OTHER women during the course of her lifetime".
---------- (for those ladies born prior to 1966, you're probably quite puzzled by this remark. Sadly, you're not aware of this problem. I'll give just one example: Militant extremists have infiltrated virtually every university. And their ONLY purpose for being there is to physically force themselves upon every 'fellow-female' student. This is truly sickening.
(Now, here's some more insight: the media is trying to force girls to comply with the dogma described above. And someday, we'll all realize: IT'S NOT IN HER BEST INTEREST. Indeed, we're gonna have a generation of young ladies who develop severe mental problems IF this extremist goal is fulfilled. But either way, this assault will literally be forced upon them. (it's ironic: the Femmes try to encourage this activity, but if that doesn't succeed, they'll FORCE her , instead. Anyway, I'm sorry but there's no time to tell all the stories I've heard about Young ladies who've been bullied into this. Yet ironically, the Hippies forbid Men and Women from Flirting with one another.
UPDATE: I've studied the Adult personals for several months. And there's evidence which substantiates my claims. Often, you'll see profiles of women seeking men. And the lady will sometime include an updated message in her profile: "Hey Ladies, I don't know why you keep trying to contact me. I've clearly stated that I'm a heterosexual. And I'm seeking relations with a man". INTERESTINGLY: she's sometimes include a 2nd plea: "Hey ladies, I've already told you before that I'm not seeking women, but you insistantly continue contacting me". The woman sometimes explains that it's inappropriate for the other women to use such strong sexual language, despite her pleas. Isn't that strange? Men are not allowed to talk dirty to women. But, this rule doesn't apply to the alternative encounters. NOW, HERE'S THE MOST DISTURBING NEWS: I saw a ladies profile which gave 4 separate warnings to the women who were harassing her. And she said, "I'm Warning you for the last time, before reporting you. I've told you several times before that I'm a straight woman,,,,, and I don't know why you ladies keep trying to contact me". OKAY PEOPLE, I've just shown you that there are alot of women in this country who are trying to Force Lesbianism upon others. So, they're targeting women who would otherwise choose a male partner. And these ladies are trying to force them into choosing the alternative. And you still don't think there's a serious problem in this country? Also remember: the rules of proper conduct obviously DON'T apply to these trouble-makers. Whilst the Activists have made it nearly impossible for men and women to meet one another, these same Femmes don't follow those same rules.
Just remember: I reluctantly included this quote because it's such a serious issue. And these Femmes intend to spread Lesbianism to each and every woman. It's comparable to the Media Onslaught which has already tarnished the personalities of every woman. The Activists will only take more extreme measures. AND PLEASE REMEMBER: these are the same advocates who've turned flirting into a punishable offense.
UPDATE 2--- I've witnessed this Sexual bullying in our barrooms, as well as, our Universities. I've done work at quite a few colleges, and the Women's Groups ARE NOT Discreet when trying to push their Forced-Lesbian-Agenda upon the masses. It's a serious problem. These Militant Activists have already established control over the entire Media. What makes you think their presence will subside? Rather instead, you should only expect them to get worse.
Here's the Bottom Line: You could read through countless profiles in the Adult Personals, where Straight Women are Seeking Men. And there are indirect hints which suggest many of them are being continuously harassed by Extremist Groups. Please Remember: The Femme Activists treat their campaign like a full-time occupation. YOU shold already notice this fact. There's no reason to think it wouldn't also pertain to this field, as well.
************************************



"Most Laws are generally made with the indirect purpose of screwing men" ....... okay, besides the obvious examples: let's examine the laws which infringe upon Free-expression. Hmmm, actually: I SHOULD BE HAPPY with this idea, since it might spare me from her verbal assault. Afterall, we've been surrounded by 'female-orientated' literature in the work-force (as well as: public facilities, government buildings, etc.) *****But instead, I'm the one who ends up getting screwed by these new laws. Perhaps, they'll arrest me for daring to make a trivial remark. And while the police are escorting me away, I'll pass a thousand 'Womanly Billboards' along the way. (Hmmm, You get the message). *****Just remember, *****most laws are designed with the intentions of targeting against men.
(disclaimer: I would absolutely never attempt to solve this problem by inflicting the same damage upon her. Once in a while, the media will target against One Lone woman; just to prove they're not biased against men. And, the media is willing to 'sacrifice' one random lady in the process. --- I am deeply against these tactics. *****basically: my group would NEVER condone destroying the life of any individual.)


******************************************

"Activism is a Mixture of Contradicting Messages".
-------- (First, they impose Cruelty upon you. And they also declare themselves to be oppressed.
--- THey'll cut you up, like a knife. But they'll also support 'Justice for all'.
--- They literally 'Rape The life Out of You', yet also get a Neo-positive message across.
--- They dominate me, and then, claim the opposite is true.
--- They degrade me, only to insist that otherwise is the case.
--- Most of all, it's usually hidden behind a shadow of lesser issues.
--- You must admit,the News Media often speaks of her basic 'dignity' as though the whole-damn issue is valid. But at the same time, other News programs literally 'Bite-My-Head-Off'.

******************************************
--"When it comes to arrogance, power, and lack of ACCOUNTABILITY, journalists are probably the only people on the planet who make THE WORSE lawyers look good". -Steven Brill. -----------------------Now, you probably think I'm an idiot for posting such remarks on MySpace. But, please tell: ***why don't you feel the same way about those pushy 'journalists' (as well as, the 'activists') Afterall, [they] CONSTANTLY dictate rules & mandates? Please direct alittle anger toward them.---Afterall, "The Activists" will probably impose themselves upon you within the next hour, or even less). ----Let's face a simple truth: "The Media WANTS to control your life" so, why don't you stop their effort? Let them know that it won't be tolerated. Boycott your local newspaper.
--------------(now ask yourself a VERY SILLY question: what are the most important news events of our generation? Tonya Harding, Nancy Kerrigan, O.J., Monika Lewinsky, Joey Buttafuoco, Tawana Brawley, Lorena Bobbitt, school shoot-outs, and a war-profiteer named Michael Moore. Yup, I know more about this stuff than I could ever possibly wanna know. It's "The Complete Encyclopedia of Useless information".
-----Now, Ask yourself: ---if 100,000 murders were committed during the 1980's U.S.A., then why did the media spend most of their time targeting against Clarence Thomas? Why did the media decide to Pick-on him? The reason is simple: Our Journalists determine which stories the viewing audience will watch. (***and, although the allegations against him were false and purged, that's not the point anyway. *************PLUS, even if he was guilty, iT surely wouldn't have been such a big deal anyway. *******ALSO) the sleezy accuser, Anita H., belonged to several extremist groups. .....The MEDIA forgot to mention that fact).
......Please remember: The News Media should be treated as a Big business. And they must abide by the same rules which they dictate to others. -------THEREFORE, those 'employees' who are opinionated or verbally expressive, shouldn't have been hired in the first place.
*********************



---"Freedom of Speech DOES NOT (and should not) apply academics" & School teachers. ------ There are a lot of teachers and Professors who abuse their powers under disguise of free speech. It is pure authority, as well as unprofessional ethics. And surely, they shouldn't be allowed to dictate their viewpoint as a curriculum.
******************

CHAPTER 122----here's alittle satiracal humor:---
"I used to think Most ladies were bad-news. But now, I've come to realize they're even worse than I thought !" ------------Gosh,...Have you ever read some of those women's profiles in various dating-agencies? I can describe them in 3 words: "They're WICKED, mean, & Nasty". And, more importantly, the entire attitude of Her 'profiles' are directly influenced by magazines, as well as, 'the idiot box'. So, what else can I say? .....THAT'S really Wicked.

**************************************

CHAPTER 123-----If I pushed my viewpoint upon you, it would be considered tyranny. Yet when your favorite Hollywood star dictates their views onto us, they're considered daring and heroic
*******************
CHAPTER 127------

This next quote sums every aspect of our lives:
********"There is No Graver form of Inequality than "Special Interest".***** ------------Indeed, Many will seek consequential privilege through A shielded disguise of Justice and reasoning."--- So, Just remember: I am opposed to Special Interest OF ANY KIND. (Or even to the most trivial degree)

**************************


CHAPTER 129----"Boredom is the Root to All Evil"---- Many politicians today are lured to make senseless laws, just because they've got nothing better to do with their time. ....Not enough office space, too much spare time on your hands, and nothing to do. This is a recipe for disaster. NOW, you should know why ancient civilizations built Grand Monuments, whether or not those structures served any practical use. The leaders began those projects to Keep everybody's mind's "occupied". (In other words: To make sure the lower-subjects didn't become "bored" and start thinking about a revolution.) It's similar to giving Candy to a kid, in order to keep him out of trouble. ----- SO, maybe, we should keep our politicians TOO busy to make senseless laws.



****************************
"It is Unfair for a 'man-of-color' to show preference for ladies outside his ethnicity. ". ------------------ Okay, please don't be angered by that remark. And, of course, it works both ways. I realize it might seem crude. --------Basically: I'm NOT offended by Mixed relationships, SUPPOSING they occur by mere chance. I believe such marriages are PERFECTLY FINE, when Two People Really Love eachother. ------BUT, when a man of color shuns dozens of ladies within his race, just to meet a Euro woman.... That's NOT okay. (and, in technical terms, he's racist) (and of course, Vice Versa) UPDATE: since posting this statement: I've encountered 3 more cases where a man of color rejected dozens of ladies, just to meet One who's outside his race. I'm telling you: IT'S JUST NOT RIGHT. ------Next Quote:


**********************************************************

Regarding many people who've named themselves "Liberals". They've stolen a title which has already existed for centuries. But they should not be given this namesake...'Because They're viewpoint is actually NOT "Liberal" -------(.but this powerful word will further their own popularity. I will admit, the word 'Liberal' by itself isn't bad at all. Maybe, That's what entices us to belong to their thinking. --- But the people who bear this namesake are anything but Liberal. ----------Here's just one example: a politician was recently "caught" sending a text message to his lover. ---Yea? So what? It's not my business if he's having an affair. Surprisingly The Leftists are often judging morality. And they tend to act forceful & restrictive. ---Basically, Their views aren't really Liberal. (maybe this explains why alot of people have switched sides along the years.) ---(Disclaimer: I am not against 'classic' Democrats), ****The so-called Liberals of today actually possess the worse elements of Strict Conservatism, as well as the reckless & Chaotic side of extremism. ------(...just remember who imposed all of those 'No Smoking' laws: the so-called "leftists" did.)-------(disclaimer: not all Democrats are corrupted)
****************************

The Activists are just plain WRONG. But MORE IMPORTANTLY, Who elected them to speak for everyone, anyway?
***********************
forced immodesty


the ultimate problem is that, our mothers have brainwashed their sons into forced immodesty. Also, whether you admit it, or not, women actually want to examine men. I can remember, as a kid, everytime I visited my friends, I would always change my clothing while the mother insisted upon being present. and,when I disagreed, she insisted that it was no different than if she was my own mother. Basically , these moms wanted to be there, and they were always insistant upon it. Most people fail to recognize this fact.
SO, on similar terms, when I've been in the hospital, female staff prefer to observe me. It's their wish. and, if I hesitate, they'll usually talk me into it. Should I say it???? they desire me. ANd, more importantly, they want acceptance in this area.

I am today's premier Men's Rights Activist. And I can assure you, women want most long-held existing social standars to remain in tact. And , just one of those happens to be 'forced immodesty'. ahhh, you've never thought of it, that way....

And, ultimately, our mothers are behind this inequality.

>The reason men's wishes are seemingly ignored is
>because over the years men, themselves, have "trained"
>caregivers that it is ok to deny privacy to males.
>
>Now men have a definite uphill battle. It is very hard
>to undo the "training" and habits of many years. Those
>who wish to reverse the standard operating procedures
>will not have an easy time of it because the general
>attitude among women is that men have no need or wish
>for privacy.
>
>So, if men want to be respected in their wish for
>privacy, they must demand it, literally, regardless of
>the put-downs described in the previous post. Frankly,
>I find it hard to believe that a caregiver would say
>anything like that out loud, although their actions
>might reveal that they have such thoughts.
>
>If men don't wish to assert their wishes and demand
>their rights, then they have no business complaining
>about being treated as though they have no need for
>privacy. Why?
>Because their acceptance of being denied privacy
>appears to the caregiver to be approval of what is
>taking place.

*******************************

> Chapter 141

"People always get the answers which they're searching for" HERE'S A MORE COMPLEX version of that quote: ['Research' & 'In-depth' Studies always produce the exact results which meets their expectations.

Chapter 142---
If I choose a differing viewpoint....then, I SHOULDN'T BE REQUIRED TO at least "Partially" agree with you----(have you ever watched a RARE T.V. program which focuses on Men's Rights? (Or Father's Rights?) Usually, about 40% of THAT specific program is devoted toward women instead)



*********************************
Chapter 144---
Most folks proudly insist that they're Not judgmental of others. That's really great. but there's one small problem. You will often try to "embarrass" someone. maybe, by finding out little secrets about them, or some other silly reason. And that's worse than Judging someone.----- Could I please expand on that remark... We are living in the 21st Century. Yet, when a 40 year-old single woman meets an available single male for "liaisons", they must do so in total secrecy. Not for reasons of Moral Judgment. But instead, because of sheer embarrassment.
***************************


Chapter 148----"If given a choice, the average lady would PREFER to exist in a world of complex circumstances" .....In other words, she WANTS to live upon a dogmatic society surrounded by "issues", rather than exact similarity. ......


***************************

Sometimes, the occasional violence is necessary in order to prevent a Mass-genocide.

chapter 154----
Partial-acceptance should not require full-agreement. Here's the problem. Many people support simple ideas which are historically "Left-Winged". (helping the environment, or, giving leniency for convicts, etc. And I support these noble ideas, as well.) BUT, just because you happened to believe in some 'Leftist' ideals, you shouldn't subscribe to every corrupt idea which in now imposed by 'extremists'. Their only goal is to wage destruction against society (especially targeting against men). And sadly, most Left-winged Americans feel obligated to comply, just because you belong to the same political affiliation.

**********************************

THE INFAMOUS 1950's MAGAZINE ARTICLE


You people really make me laugh.

YOu dig into some remote archive, claiming justification for being angry.

You should open your eyes.

RIGHT NOW, there is an entire media campaign targeted against males. Why would you be interested in showing something which is supposedly biased against women?

YOu should take a good look around. there are nearly infinite examples of media bias against men.

So, what's everybody's problem?


On similar terms:
Is it not true, the Feminists have been trying to remove men from the family unit?
So, why are you daring to talk about 'bias' which is supposedly against women?
I could give countless examples of bias against men.




***********************************



. And we men already know that women are compulsive masturbators. And this video clip is false anyway. They claim 60 percent of women wank at some time during their lives. Actually, 100% of all girls masturbate before boys. Finally, why do you always try to make a political statement out of everything. This is nothing more than wanking. But you treat it like a political statement. Hmmm, in fact, women treat everything like a serious issue. Fuck them it’s such a joke


******************************
NAKED DOUBLE STANDARDS
Hi, beth. I'm sorry to reply to an old post.. but, I really must say something about your experience of observing boys. Quite simply: you could have offered to show your body. It's really that simple. The reason why boys don't ask, is because he's afraid , she' ll become angry. it's really stupid, but, girls tend to be that way. They over-react. and boys are afraid to assirt their desires to see her. Plus, even worse, he's afraid of getting into trouble. Assault laws target against little boys, as well as men. SO, when you asked the boy to expose himself, he was still afraid of asking you, because the consequences could be severe. This also explains why girls have walked in, while I take a shower. because they can... Here's a good example: have you read newspaper acticles where some guy tried to kiss a female employee, or something totally insignificant. and this sort of thing actually becomes a newspaper headline. That's sick and this sort of repression exists from early childhood. ALSO, MOTHERS could teach their sons NOT TO TOLERATE THIS type of inequality. That would be a simple solution...


**************************


Oh, here’s my response to a previous post “Men are a lot stronger”:  It’s socially unacceptable for a man to strike a lady, therefore, it wouldn’t matter if he was 50 times stronger.   Okay, I’m too sensitive, right? 


*************************
Answer: most women say: Get over it.

2) cleaning ladies walk into men's rest rooms without knocking, and nurses often casually interrupt physicals which she is not participating in.
Answer by most women: “Take it like a man”.

3) nurses give physicals, but they don't fully close the drapes.
Answer most women say: “Too bad, you big cry baby”.

4)college girls sometimes run into the boys shower room. It's a “girls will be girls” sort of thing.
Most women respond: “what's the matter, can't you take it? Are you afraid she's gonna find out your weenie is small?” “and you guys are also too fat”.

5) boys in high school receive communal physicals, while the drapes are partially opened, and the doors are rarely locked.
Women respond by saying: “You're a big cry baby”.
6) Not long ago, moms would take their children to a public swimming pool. But the moms would neglect to bring a suit for her sons. Therefore, he's told to swim naked, in front of everyone.
Her response: “It's no big deal”. “they're just boys”. “and besides, we've all seen one, before”.

7) back in the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's, men's locker rooms have always been indirectly accessible to women. Moms sometimes helped their toddler sons change, but there was a risk that an adult male would accidentally be seen. Or, When a female shaperone helped the children change their clothes, she would always forget some article of clothing. In which case, several minutes later, she simply walked into the Male locker room to retrieve it. And, by that time, the men were already changing.
Her response: “Don't worry, we're not interested in looking”.

7b) most people don't realize, Female affiliates have always freely visited men's lockers. Mothers, wives, cleaning ladies, launderers, and the immediate families of staff and management.
Common response: “Every adult woman can handle this maturely. it's no different than is she was your mother.”

8) worst of all: Government doctrinated court-orders legally permit women to freely roam into men's lockers. This truly is disgusting. Now, it's one thing for a lady to walk in, for good reason. Perhaps, she's on the medical staff, tending to a wounded athlete. Or, she's a professional trainer, employed by the sports owner, who really feels that she needs to be there. But, it's entirely different when this becomes government sanctions by court order. This truly is an outrage when reporters can enter, without being prevented.
The common response: “If you don't like it, then throw a towel on it.” Boy, that's an insulting response

10) mothers often walk into the men's room, because she very well can't take her boy into the ladies room. (Ummm, why can't she? The Ladies rooms always contain individual stalls. Therefore, it makes sense for a child to accompany it's mother, in the LADIES room. NOT the men's room).
Common response: “TOO bad, if you don't like it”. Gee, that's very blunt.
11) When a boy changes his clothes, the mothers and female guardians are often present. Then, when he'd old enough to be alone, the females still walk in, without knocking. When a mother changes her son's clothing, she usually leaves the door half-open. This can often be observed by all.
Common answer: get used to it.
12) Female principals Strip-search boys, merely because he skips class. Female guards watch the male inmates while they shower. Orphanages permit Female staff to freely walk into the boys locker rooms, and bathrooms.
Answer: “But it's necessary”. “They must perform these duties”. Okay, at least, this is somewhat of a rational and tactful answer.
13)
************************************
, There's a bottom line to this whole saga. The social Privileges which exist for women are truly immeasurable. I'm not saying whether that's good or bad. (by the way, I'm aware that the media tells us a much different story, suggesting that women are negatively stereotyped, etc. etc. But their claims are completely false).

Women are given countless intangible advantages, in our everyday society. THis issue serves as merely a few indications, stemming from a much broader scale.

*********************************
44. BLAME IT ON ORGANIZED NUDITY
THE MORAL EROSION OF AMERICA:
WHY DID AMERICA FROM THE 1950S - 1970S FORCE BOYS TO SWIM NAKED ?
It was the Communists , in The Communist Manifesto
( a crime manual ) here is a quote from the Communist Manifesto:
” The Manifesto suggested a course of action for a proletarian (working class) revolution to overthrow the bourgeois social order and to eventually bring about a classless and stateless society, and the abolition of private property. ”
Well it worked, America is NOT going to be a Super Power for much longer, because of this bad policy..countries like Iran will develope WMD at a faster rate, and because America brain froze its thinking class , we’ll be passive and allow these criminals to streal top secret 75 year COPYRIGHT PROTECTED Data..even the A Bomb is United States Priority Date still.
Somehow the CIA through project Bluelbird ordered Schools to Force Students into Organized Nudity to Brain Freeze them.,
maybe under the idea that America would soon be leaving the Silver Standard and by Brain Freezing Students through organized nudity , civilization would accept valueless paper money as we have been since 1969-1970.
somehow the Communists Bribed the CIA through project Bluelbird , to force and degrade the thinking ability of America’s children:
here’s a quote from Wikipedia on Project Bluelbird
” BLUEBIRD was the cryptonym for a CIA program involving special interrogation methods, including the use of drugs, hypnosis,[1] and isolation. It lasted from 1949 to 1950 when it was renamed “ARTICHOKE”, and would eventually become the infamous MKULTRA. Responsibility for the project mainly lay with the Office of Scientific Intelligence. ”
The FBI’s J Edgar Hoover should have done something more to stop the Abuse of America’s children , even Psychoanalyssi education would ahve helped prevent the moral decay of the United States.
NOTICE THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL IS THE NEED FOR FOOD.
45. Jerry G. Says:


******************************




regarding Government sanctioned Forced Nudity,
It WOULD HAVE been a huge deal if it happened to you. Thus, if YOU had been the victim instead, you would've probably wanted to see revenge. and, alot of people would've probably hanged for it.
Also, it scares me, that you're acting this way, despite being in your late 40's.
Also, it's interesting how ladies promote this whole idea "girls are not really the least bit interested in seeing boys". But instead, You just wanted to laugh at us.
Afterall, who would ever be interested in guys, anyhow?
also, what ever happened to the claim that "girls have a low self-esteem"?. or, "girls often feel as if, she's ugly or unattractive"? rather instead, people always make him feel "ugly". I could be insulting too, by saying that most women's bodies are "odd-shaped" and "imperfect".
Most importantly, it scares me to think that you might currently have a son. I surely hope you don't treat him with such indifference and disrespect.
Finally, most women don't even know men. As a matter of fact, we don't need to gaze at the female body for more than 3 minutes. Yea, it gets boring real quick. Plus, As with most men, I'm primarily interested in Love & relationships. Of course, everything else is secondary.
And, Sue, I'm sure, if I had seen girls bodies , I could have judged it as being "flawed" and "funny looking".
Plus, I'm not happy being in the role where "males are more interested in females, than vice versa. " Actually, most men seek a wonderful personality. That's the real reason why men choose sexy women. It's not for their looks or body. Instead, That type of woman happens to be friendly toward him.
Now, let's talk about the singular issue which has most severely ruined my life. "Forced Nudity". Should I repeat that? This issue happens to be a big deal. Most men HATED this experience. And nobody ever talked about it. But, they were able to get on with their lives. Only a few men thoroughly enjoyed forced nudity , these guys are now here eagerly participating on these forums. And they're enthusiasm is keeping other men at a status of lesser dignity. This happens to be a major social dilemma: Men are hurting eachother. And, women love it when men look stupid...
I wonder why these guys would spend 600 POSTS trying to prove that the whole thing was "no big deal". It seems rather odd to me. They're being harsh and insensitive just because the victims were boys. It's called "Social Inequality".
@@@@@ You're all Putting males at a status of lesser dignity. That's perhaps what this whole issue is really about.
ANd, What about the men on this forum? Many of them happened to come from a very anti-male generation. This explains why they're desperately trying to hurt my cause. And, indeed, they are hindering my progress. WHILE IRONICALLY, they all admit, their own sons never willingly change their clothes in locker rooms. Duh.
Anyway Sue,
Please treat me with more respect NOW. Although these incidents took place 30 years ago, there's still a negative attitude resounding in these forums. I feel like I'm back in school, again. Nothing can be done about the past, but you could be more tactful NOW.
These months have convinced me, I had every right to develop total hatred through decades time passing, as a result of my experiences. ...Because these nasty attitudes are still present, till this very day.
I needed to speak out....
That's all I want to say
*********************************


You're Everything a Woman Could Be


I hate to say this, but, we need to teach all the peoples of this earth to stop their racist beliefs. Unfortunately, only the Caucasian race has been instructed to embrace these open-minded beliefs.

However, during my travels overseas, I've quickly learned that most cultures are very hostile toward other peoples. Therefore ,it's ludicrous to expect My people to comply with these rules, while everyone else continues their attitudes which simply do not accept others.

*********************************
Unfortunately, Most men, such as myself, have sexual needs. And even when faced with the prospect of humiliation, males are forced to make a choice.
So, from the time we're young, girls try to humiliate boys sexually. ANd , I've always tried to resist. But, that leaves a void in my life. SO, if a male wants that part of his life to be complete, he's often forced to put himself into a humiliating position.

THAT"S SOME CHOICE, huh ???

*******************************

*****The government sanctioned forced nudity upon our males in some public schools.
**** It was a conspiracy of epidemic proportions
**** It was a brainwashing process.. ****Plus, they were teaching males to be obedient. *****Plus, they were training him for the military.. *****Plus, they were stripping him of his pride.
*****Plus, the Communist Manifesto briefly discussed this idea, of using forced nudity to remove all individuality.**** Let's also consider the The entire communal system. **** being forced to wait several minutes at the diving board.***Not allowing him to bring a towel along. ****Also, forcing him to “stand at attention” with his privates fully exposed. ****Most importantly, this “forced immodesty” gives total Social-control to women. *** it also teaches men to have no respect for themselves. And many ladies seem to prefer the type of man who always makes a fool of himself. **** Let's also consider the Political power imposed by Masonic groups and other secret societies. They practiced similar forced rituals, as part of initiation. **** IT also makes him look like the dummy. ****Ha ha, it’s his own fault for complying. *** He actually believed that story about the bathing suits clogging the pool-filter. *** or, the sheer humiliation of being told, we simply can't afford to buy swim suits. PLUS, they were usually informed this in a very crude manner. "Nope boys, you can't have swim suits. There's no room in our budget for it.". "so, too bad guys". Or, "we don't wanna clean up your wet bathing suits".

At least a few boys had some sort of validation. Only a few were given dignified reasons to make sense of it all......The two best reasons were:
1) you're swim suits increase the likelihood of spreading infectious disease. And , since you boys are always getting into mischieve, it's necessary to reduce the risk.
2) It's necessary to make sure that there are no scars on your body, or, no signs of disease. And you must be constantly checked.
@@@@@@
**** Also, at least when a girl spies upon a boy in a bedroom, he’s not fully exposed for 15 entire minutes. But, in these cases, many boys were in a huge communal gymnasium environment. They were not even allowed to have towels nearby. And, they were forced to leave their clothing ¼ mile away. Plus, the gymnasium was usually well-lit.
***********************

This so-called "I-Feminism" is just another excuse for them dictating that we must permanently surround our thoughts with them. It's the oldest trick in the book. They conjure a "reasonable" idea, so that we're forced to accept their presence. In case you haven't noticed, people discuss this subject more than anything else. Not only does the media favor women, BUT more importantly, they are constantly directing their attention toward this narrow subject. and that's alot worse than anything


***************************************

WOMEN"S STUDIES CRAP


Regardless of your opinions, 'Women's Studies' should not be a credited course. At best, it should be more of a hobby, than an academic achievement.

Also, This is certainly not a practice of diversity. "Women's Studies" serve as another example of bias against men.

In legal terms, this should not be permissible. But, in any case, your concept must be established as a total inequity. You're creating an environment which totally favors women. Regardless of how that approach is achieved, it still promotes an ideal of singularity, rather than universal inclusion. In simple terms, your goal is to remove my perspective from any form of recognition. This fact is already evident throughout the media.




the female readers of this blog:
Please take no,
There are very few Male-based websites which address these problems.
But I must inform the public regarding these injustices. ---sincere.
**************************************

> I'd like to give 3 unusual examples inequality:

1)when a man loves a woman dearly, but she claims that "he's just using her". Indeed, that's a real slap-in-the-face. Especially considering that she usually requests intimacy less often then she really wants it.

2) When a straight woman actually tries to be gay, (perhaps due to spitefulness, thirst for power & control, or, maybe trying to annoy me. Whatever the case, this is disgusting and unforgivable. (and, in contrast, gay males try to become straight.

3) The media gives her ideas on how to confront her male counterpart. Whereas, I must rely upon my own wits & intellect.

One huge purpose of this website is to recognize every hidden advantage which exists for women. This rule especially applies in discussion-forums, etc.. You might say,,, She's always got "Wild Cards" to rely upon (which ultimately gives her the upper-hand). Whether she's claiming sexual repression, or, saying "nobody ever listens", or, claiming "women are stereotyped as being Bitches (which actually stands to make MEN look bad), or, reverting to that infamous Suffrage issue. These are all conveniences at her disposal

**************************************

No comments: